Where is the original Quran?

Where is the original Quran?
Can I see Allah's Handwriting??

Ashutosh Andrade
A
1 following.
Release As Guest
19
19 ANSWER

There is no original Koran left. All that remains are multiple various copies.

Soi Norris
S

Why haven original Quran not left?

Ashutosh Andrade 3 years

To many wars between themselves.

Soi Norris 3 years

Allah was unable to save original copy of Quran..

Ashutosh Andrade 3 years

There is single version of Quran in whole world.

Muhammad Chaney 3 years

Where? If you find it you will receive a Nobel prize

Soi Norris 3 years
10 view all comment Loading...

Here we find a falsification test, a challenge to find any mistakes, errors or contradictions in the Quran.

“Do they not then consider the Qur’an carefully? Had it been from other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much contradictions.” (Quran 4:82)

This is a clear challenge to anyone who doubts that this Quran is not from Allah. It is saying that we should examine and reflect on the Quran and see if we can find any mistakes, errors or contradictions.

It would be very easy for a human being to make a mistake when writing a single volume covering so many topics ranging from science, history, prophecies, issues of the hereafter and laying down a comprehensive system of legislation. Such a human would probably not be extremely confident that his work was free of mistakes throughout, and it is likely that he would try to play down the concept of accuracy. Instead we find in the Quran that there is a clear invitation to search for mistakes.

This is far removed from ordinary human nature. This very fact that this challenge appears, shows clearly that whoever authored the Quran had extreme confidence in his own ability and accuracy, unlike an imposter or forger.

Although many people have wasted their lives trying to find errors or contradictions in the Quran, no one has come up with anything that is a genuine error in the Quran but in the end we see the Quran is exactly what it claims to be, a revelation from The Most High, Allah.

Sohaib Beaver
S

Does the Quran really say salt water and fresh don't mix?

Bill Mckinley 3 years

2) Dr. Joe Leigh Simpson is the Chairman of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Professor of Molecular and Human Genetics at the Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. Formerly, he was Professor of Obs-Gyn and the Chairman of the Department of Obs-Gyn at the University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee, USA. He was also the President of the American Fertility Society. He has received many awards, including the Association of Professors of Obstetrics and Gynecology Public Recognition Award in 1992. Professor Simpson studied the following two sayings of the Prophet muhammad:

“In every one of you, all components of your creation are collected together in your mother’s womb by forty days…”

“If forty-two nights have passed over the embryo, God sends an angel to it, who shapes it and creates its hearing, vision, skin, flesh, and bones….”

He studied these two sayings of the Prophet muhammad extensively, noting that the first forty days constitute a clearly distinguishable stage of embryo-genesis. He was particularly impressed by the absolute precision and accuracy of those sayings of the Prophet muhammad. Then, during one conference, he gave the following opinion:

“So that the two hadeeths (the sayings of the Prophet muhammad) that have been noted provide us with a specific time table for the main embryological development before forty days. Again, the point has been made, I think, repeatedly by other speakers this morning: These hadeeths could not have been obtained on the basis of the scientific knowledge that was available [at] the time of their writing . ... It follows, I think, that not only there is no conflict between genetics and religion but, in fact, religion can guide science by adding revelation to some of the traditional scientific approaches, that there exist statements in the Quran shown centuries later to be valid, which support knowledge in the Quran having been derived from God.”

Sohaib Beaver
S

This is not valid.

Soi Norris
S

What's invalid?

Ashutosh Andrade 3 years

Not having the requirements to qualify

Soi Norris 3 years

Original Quran is in My Hart...

Memi Bravo
M

Not valid either

Soi Norris 3 years

Not your Words.... Hahaha

Memi Bravo 3 years

Why Allah doesn't say he is one Why he said"say "Allah is one?

Ashutosh Andrade 3 years

This is Highest Gramatik in Quran.... This gramatik didn't exist before... Say - is directly Comand to Mohamedp. B.u. H and to every Muslim .. That's mean it came down as a Comand to explain People Allah is One...

Memi Bravo 3 years

When this Verse came down Allah Said: Say - that's mean: Say Now, don't wait, go out and explain to Menkind that God is One....

Memi Bravo 3 years

This is Part that Devide us from other Religions which Belive in Many Gods !!! We believe in Monoteism.. And that mean: God is One...

Memi Bravo 3 years

Hinduism also believe in one Supreme soul

Ashutosh Andrade 3 years
9 view all comment Loading...

Can you show me headache ?

Syed Dejesus
S

Can you show me original Koran ?

Soi Norris
S

com-kuw1tzakka69syo793f8.jpg

Abdiraxiim Parsons
A

Not the word.. Lol the book

Soi Norris 3 years

Thousands years ago israel asked moses just like these stupid question you asks now, but be carefull what your say, becouse the humanbeings we have limit donot cross allaah's border it helps you that is my advice on you

Abdiraxiim Parsons
A

Narrated Qatada: I asked Anas bin Malik: Who collected the Qur'an at the time of the Prophet? He replied, Four, all of whom were from the Ansar, Ubai bin Ka'b, Muadh bin Jabal, Zaid bin Thabit and Abu Zaid. Sahih Bukhari 6:61:525 Narrated Anas bin Malik: When the Prophet died, none had collected the Qur'an but four persons: Abu Ad Darda, Mu'adh bin Jabal, Zaid bin Thabit and Abu Zaid. We were the inheritor (of Abu Zaid) as he had no offspring . Sahih Bukhari 6:61:526 If you cannot even agree on who collected the Qur'an then how can you even begin to claim the Qur'an is intact exactly how it was revealed?

Ashutosh Andrade 3 years

Ashutosh Andrade your question was not who collected the quraan, okay go back an read your post,

Abdiraxiim Parsons 3 years

U should see a very huge hospital for mental treatment

Atiq Jaramillo
A

Lol... Can you answer the question. atiq

Soi Norris
S

soi, this guy doesn't know anything about Islam... Writing here is only wasting of time

Atiq Jaramillo 3 years

I want too to see

Gagan Riggs
G

go and ask Google

Einstein Wooten
E

Done and there is no original Koran known to exist. Do you know otherwise

Soi Norris
S

Al Quran was written by pen it self when Allah set commands and tells to it and it preserved in tablet so it will be safe untill the last day of Resurection

Syed Anaya
S

Where are they ?

Soi Norris 3 years

Allah didn't use to write, He just sent His message to Mohammed (pbuh) and Mohammad (pbuh) delivered it to His people. And people wrote to save it! Quran is the same as it was 1400 years ago!

Farhan Macdonald
F

What is scripture? Scripture is defined as the word of God, which is the knowledge given by God for the sake of welfare of humanity. All agree to this. But, to give word, which is preaching of knowledge, God must have mouth and throat. We have established that God is unimaginable because the substance with which God is made and the original form in which God exists are unimaginable. In such case, how can you say that God has told this or that? Even the Veda, believed as the composed scripture by God, mentions the names of sages as the composers (Rushi) of each part. This clearly shows that the sages have composed the Vedas. Lord Buddha, one of the human incarnations, also told that the Vedas are composed by human beings (devoted sages) only and hence the Vedas are called as ‘Paurusheyas’. All this is perfectly correct as one side of the concept. The other side of this topic is to believe the Vedas as scriptures composed by God and hence the Vedas are called as ‘Apaurusheyas’. There is a controversy between Buddha and Hindu tradition in this point. Instead of bringing controversy up and to conclude that Buddha and Hindu tradition differ with each other, it is always better to show the correlation between these two opposing views. The correlation is that God revealed this knowledge called the Veda to the devoted sages and these devoted sages expressed that divine knowledge in their own statements. The composer of knowledge is God and the composer of the statement expressing that knowledge is the devoted sage.

In the angle of God, the Veda is Aparusheya and in the angle of the devoted sage, the Veda is Paurusheya. Both views are correct without any contradiction. But, the meaning of statement is knowledge and this is the most important essence by which alone humanity is benefited. The language acts as a vehicle of communication only and is not so important as the knowledge. The goods in the vehicle is knowledge and the vehicle is the language. Both are necessary.

Ashutosh Andrade
A

Still no news of any original texts.

Soi Norris
S