Since Islam is basically a theocracy, do you think that the hijab and hiqab are political statements?

Islam is a religion you’re still trying to present your incorrect opinion as fact.

So stupid

Please refer to the right definition of theocracy .

In the West they are.

And no they’re not. They’re an article of CLOTHING

A Religion that doesnt seperate spirituality to State Law, criminal, trade, inheritance, war.... İs not merely just a ordinary Religion. Its a spiritual political System what we can call theocracy

Its a clothing that seperates the belivers from the non believers. So its a Statement. "We are the pure and modest choosen people of god, you are bitches."

Thats why slave maids in islamic societys werent obliged to wear hijab and could even show theyr breast to theyr male owners.

Y’all are retarded as fuck. Believe whatever bullshit narrative that gets you off. Doesn’t make it factual.

I love the islamic way of discussion. They always show their manners straight.

Even women have bad manners when they have no arguments left. WOW

Is this true that -- "Honorable or good muslim women wear hajab But low class muslim women don't"? This is the understanding of few muslims in my community. They base their understanding from the following hadith. Please clarify. I'm producing the hadith for your convinience. This hadith is recorded in the Sahih of Al-Bukhari with the following wording: The Companion Anas ibn Malik narrates: The Prophet stayed for three rights between Khaibar and Medina and was married to Safiya. I invited the Muslims to his marriage banquet and there was neither meat nor bread in that banquet but the Prophet ordered Bilal to spread the leather mats on which dates, dried yogurt and butter were put. The Muslims said amongst themselves, "Will she (i. E. Safiya) be one of the mothers of the believers, (i. E. one of the wives of the Prophet ) or just (a lady captive) of what his right-hand possesses?" Some of them said, "If the Prophet makes her observe the veil, then she will be one of the mothers of the believers (i. E. one of the Prophet's wives), and if he does not make her observe the veil, then she will be his lady slave." So when he departed, he made a place for her behind him (on his camel) and made her observe the veil. Few thing I'd like to know more are time frame of this incident, before or after the revelation of Al-Ahzab( 33:59) etc. I'm seeking your opinion as par on-line hadithsearch's recommendation.
Published Date: 2000-10-11
The hadeeth came after the revelation of the hijaab and after it was made obligatory for the believing women. But the full hijaab is only for free women; slaves and concubines should not resemble free women by wearing the full hijaab. A slave woman does not have to cover her face, and ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with him) used to forbid them to do so. This is the case if there is no fear of fitnah from them; but if there is fitnah, then they have to do whatever will prevent that fitnah.

since islam is a religious augmenting reality game all the dress-codes are there for personal entrainment first.. And is allowed for as far as regional (secular) laws allow it. So if (religious) gamers want to claim their game rules to have more majority than regional (secular) law, and to claim more rights try to wear the game-related ware as protest in public spaces, then it is a political statement... But their game would stay a game nevertheless.

Because Islam is fabrictated Violent Bullshit. And you are a miserable discussion Partner Sarah Mejia

Social and collective oppression for women.

its a hat. İf its scaring the crap out of everyone around you and you still wont take it off then maybe it IS a political and social statement

If your clothes identifies a theocracy you are in a political statement