Do any of their Scriptures offer predictive consequences that can be relied upon to occur, or critiqued by when they don't? If not, then they do not pass the epistemic tests that science offers us.
Science is not in the business of proving things fact. Rather, science judges the merits of competing models based on simplicity, comprehensiveness and fit to the data. The word 'fact' is not a useful term in science. When someone offers an explanation (model), in order to establish that their explanation is an improvement on competing explanations there must be some predictive consequences - Either direct, indirect, eventual, or immediate. It is because only science holds out for predictive consequences that their explanation pass that epistemic test in a way religion can't/doesn't
We we not created in the way you think we were. But once we became the dominant species on Earth our brains created stories and myths. Our ancestors mourned the dead by placing artifacts in the graves because they didn't fully understand death. They figured that if it was some sort of transitional period that they would need stuff in the "next phase". Then people discovered psychoactive substances and shamanistic rituals began, including the Australian aboriginals "dream time". And from then it developed into some form of religion, mostly based on power over others. Humans like order, spiritually faded and we just went to a building to chant mantras to things that don't exist. Religion is just a reminder that we are too intelligent to just exist. That's also why we have arts and other things that occupy our minds.
All religious have some science in it.
Hinduism isn't the oldest.
wrong chart though. İt's the oldest.
Yeah sure. Doesn't matter anyway, they are all just make belief for weak people.
This is a history of evolution not religion
Eh? Can you not read?
Also, look up the word evolution. Hint. It isn't only about the development of animals from bacterium to the advanced apes we see now.
And everyone's on facebook
Or creation
Creation has no history. It's a human mind notion.
Man developed then started worshipping stuff. It's not rocket science bro.
those who try to understand it, may get it but dismissing dharma with biblical POV is stupidity
Do any of their Scriptures offer predictive consequences that can be relied upon to occur, or critiqued by when they don't? If not, then they do not pass the epistemic tests that science offers us.
Science is not based on predictions but facts...
Science is not in the business of proving things fact. Rather, science judges the merits of competing models based on simplicity, comprehensiveness and fit to the data. The word 'fact' is not a useful term in science. When someone offers an explanation (model), in order to establish that their explanation is an improvement on competing explanations there must be some predictive consequences - Either direct, indirect, eventual, or immediate. It is because only science holds out for predictive consequences that their explanation pass that epistemic test in a way religion can't/doesn't
We we not created in the way you think we were. But once we became the dominant species on Earth our brains created stories and myths. Our ancestors mourned the dead by placing artifacts in the graves because they didn't fully understand death. They figured that if it was some sort of transitional period that they would need stuff in the "next phase". Then people discovered psychoactive substances and shamanistic rituals began, including the Australian aboriginals "dream time". And from then it developed into some form of religion, mostly based on power over others. Humans like order, spiritually faded and we just went to a building to chant mantras to things that don't exist. Religion is just a reminder that we are too intelligent to just exist. That's also why we have arts and other things that occupy our minds.
Oppenheimer is not a religious scholar.
He is unreliable on religion
Are you a religious scholar... Are you reliable on this forum ?
This is great religious problem. I'm affected by religious violence and terrorism
cool = = thank you
Oppenheimer was fighting demon's.!!!
What is the world's oldest religion?
sanatan dharma is the oldest religion.
What is the evidences for it ? Archaeological or paleontological?
10 k years old scriptures have been found
Tested by which method?
wrote on paper?
Carbon dating bitch
What is Swarga in hinduism?
Siva Chetty this guy is dumb. He only have these memes to post n run away
Craz Moyer swarg means state of happiness n joy
Sound so loud 'coz of company? x'na shitma?
Craz Moyer do u realize anyone can make memes?
Ideal behind the idol