Evidence seem to point out that scientists with religious believes have been more productive than atheists scientists
This is pretty silly. No theist/atheist scientist with any credibility takes/ a deity into their work area. They might ‘be’ a theist/atheist but you’ll still not find a credible science book that invoked any god in it. It’s typical false equivalency.
LOL.. You don't represent science... What u represent is atheism ... Scientists as a whole represents science. It's a common sense.
Amimul Navarro where did I say I represent scientists?
I didn't say you represent scientists. I said you don't represent science. And you indirectly claimed that scientists do not represent science when they believe in God.
No I didn’t. I clearly stated that no credible science book ever invoked any god, because any credible scientist would not include ‘religious faith’ in their work. Try reading it again, kid.
OK, so u believe that scientists represent science when they believe in God r8?
And as the majority of scientists in the world are theists, it’s only a matter of statistics. But again, they are (usually) good scientists, who happen to be theists. There’s no real correlation between scientific discoveries and the sky fairy they were likely indoctrinated into.
ofcourse brahman does
You believe in a god with four heads and four arms. And you claim to be logical. I don't mean to disrespect but it's a fact. Explain me how can god have these features. Dr. Octopus from spiderman had four arms.. A fictional character. And I also heard some one cursed Bhama. Probably Shiva. And Brahma desired Sarasvati.. His own daughter ?? What the fuck man ?? God had sexual desires.. And also incestual desire??? And those three Shiva, Brahma and the other one Vishnu make one true god Brahman ??? OK
Amimul Navarro lol this will remind u what father will always be a father n son will be son. İnstead of worrying about what i believe u should worry in what u believe. Allah the minor pagan moon god who had 3 daughters n all of them had symbiotic relationship with it. later he predicted earth is flat, sun sets in muddy pool n made a mental idiot momo his messenger. Sadly allah looks like a bull with two horns n lady bottom. he asked momo to rape his daughter fatima, daughter in law n grandson. Later told him to rape his dead aunt in a grave. funny this is when all this happened momo died of poison as allah wanted the ayesha. later this virus spread to a bengali who was scared shit of death n produced u as an bengali arab. why do u even worship that idiot ??
Kulvinder Singh Kumar lol those periyar idiots must be trying hard. Did thy still not get it ?
lol... Krishna Orozco Do you what is the difference between you guys and us? You pick up information about us written by the non-muslims which are made up just like you have done now. And we show you the references from your scriptures. Written by your scholars not by the Muslims or any other non-hindus. It is a common sense that Hindus will preserve their own scripture better than any other group of people in the world just like any other religious people will do when it comes to their own scriptures. Why then misquote if u are truthful! I was talking about the supreme being the GOD. First settle this matter. Then we will discuss about the messengers and munishis. Step by step u know. Provided u consider yourself to be truthful. That's all. If you don't believe it not my concern because Allah said in the Quran: So remind, [O Muhammad]; you are only a reminder. You are not over them a controller. Quran [ 88: 21-22] And krishna seriously where do get those stuffs? 3 sons ... Seriously dude The root of Islam is : Say, "He is Allah, [who is] One, Allah, the Eternal refuge. He neither begets nor is born, Nor is there to Him any equivalent." Quran [Surah: 112]
Amimul Navarro lol u know what's the difference between u n us ?? u follow terrorist naik while we quote kuran n hadis. Along with history. that's why i said u'll regret it
Its actually a fact, some of the greatest scientists have been religious people. Of course no "science guy" will ever mention it
Any ‘science guy’ will have no problem saying it, knowing it doesn’t mean that much. Many of those successful scientists certainly didn’t worship your particular sky fairy.
Isaac Newton and Galileo Galilei, just to name a few of the great ones, certainly did. Other were nonetheless theists like Albert Einstein and Max Planck
This is common knowledge. If you think scientists all believing in different gods somehow justifies yours, then that’s just a little desperate. They were such bad/good scientists, none of them ever found any evidence for the existence of any god. They simply ‘believed’ in a god, knowing there was zero evidence. Same as you. .
not a fact but best possible explanation
The majority of people are theist, so rather a silly point to make. For example. Most child molestors are theists. Go figure.
I thought that many child molestors are gay, but thats not the point does it?
They can still be gay and theists you know.
Can you find any notable scientists today who have progressed the world and also believe in sky fairies? Good luck.
Not today, all that modern scientists are doing is using for example Einstein's work, and none of them have made a breakthrough like Einstein did
Einstein didn’t believe in your sky fairy dude.
Perhaps you’ve never heard of the Higgs boson then?
But he did say that, "science without religion is lame"
Or cosmic waves... Stick to religion kid. .
And by the way he was an adherent to Intelligent Design