Patterns in Nature.
Why according to Atheism?....
I want to know atheists opinion
Why don't you ask a scientist? Patterns in nature are visible regularities of form found in the natural world. These patterns recur in different contexts and can sometimes be modelled mathematically. Natural patterns include symmetries, trees, spirals, meanders, waves, foams, tessellations, cracks and stripes.
steven did I asked you personally?! Just ignore the post if you didn't like it
You asked the group a question. Perhaps you missed that part?
Steven Connors yes that's why I'm waiting for the answer May be I could find an atheistic scientist:)
Nature is nothing to do with religion.
it has everything to do with religion, before science we had religion. Ancient hindu Vedic cosmology is a prime example
You think religion was invented before science? You don't know what science is do you?
If I was an atheist this video would get me baptized immediately. Luckily i didn't need to see it to believe we are not here by luck!
if they are not ur all might one is, i ask you which idea more senseble
Not accident. Science.
Who started that science?
Who created God?
Shaimaa Eason reliion and science wont fit each other
You want us to believe that from chaos we can get precise laws of physics and nature? Are you serious??? That's only possible with a great designer...!
And I respect that you believe that. But I don't.
yeah, right. By accident----------------
Come on people ) who started that science who planted the first seed
And who created God for him to create the universe?
Miquela Stout i like you very much, shaimaa is an idiot
Haha. Thank you!
Still no answer...
So I'm assuming you have no answer. Awesome.
It's science. The basic elements are the same. It doesn't matter where, in any part of the universe positive charges will repel each other and attract negative charges. Repeatability and reproducibility are the most important in any scientific work..
What started the atomic thing? What was before you this start
Please read the birth and death of stars and different cosmological models before u bring in ur religious babble..
Christiana Gorman have read about it
Good. Then read it again. Maybe you 'll understand it atleast the second time..
Comparing science to religion while also showing the scientific formation of the universe. Do y'all still believe in creation or did you finally realize it's lunacy.
there is a theory which EXPlained everything in this universe ...... You will get your answer in it......... BUT IN FUTURE .... BY THE GREAT scientist......... Which will change EVERYTHING in this world ......... And your imagination and science.......
I saw no creator in that short video... The eye comparison thing is just daft.... Everyone knows there are patterns in nature that video was seeking out it's own patterns for some point... That it failed on lol
Our brains are pattern seeking therefore jesus
Actually, the mathematical field of chaos theory has now shown, in relatively simple terms, that such fractal patterns as these are simply something that is inherent in the basic structure of the universe and these patterns manifest themselves in multiple ways and at all scales from the smallest to the largest. It is really nothing more than remarking on how common the circle and the sphere are in nature. All of this can be taken for an argument that there is something going on in the universe that is more than meets the eye, but that's a pretty obvious truth. The devil is in the details of how we try to describe what that something is. And it is essentially an impossible task because our limited human mental resources aren't up to the task of fully describing something so much greater. The theistic approach is just one of our feeble attempts to do so. All of these attempts also suffer from serious definitional problems. Atheism, for example, means a belief that there is no theistic god. So atheists may not believe in an old bearded man in the sky or they may not believe in a god with any type of human emotions that so many theists like to attribute to their god, but then you get into a gray area where it becomes more difficult to discern whether a belief in a fundamental order to the universe is a theistic belief or not. I would, for example, call myself an atheist (and a buddhist), but I also believe that the universe is fundamentally an intelligent system. Not intelligent in the way you might think, but intelligent in that it has a fundamental order to it. For instance, it's systems are, in numerous ways, predictable. I would not begin to venture to say I can articulate why this is, however. It's probably an unanswerable question, ultimately. O magnum mysterium.
I like your honesty. Great unbiased comment.
Quantum mechanics says that given enough time anything will happen
accident still implies an intention
infinite time before and after this second allow for everything